Pricing Strategy for Tech Products
Pricing is one of the highest-leverage decisions in a startup. A 1% improvement in price yields an average 11% profit improvement (McKinsey). Most founders underprice. This note covers the science and art of tech product pricing.
The 3 Pricing Approaches
1. Cost-Plus Pricing (avoid for SaaS)
Price = Cost × (1 + Markup %)
- Used in manufacturing and commodity goods
- Ignores customer value and competition
- For SaaS: your marginal cost is near zero → this approach breaks down
- Use case: hardware components of NOTQIN (sensors, cables)
2. Competitive Pricing (use cautiously)
Price based on what competitors charge.
- Risk: commoditizes your product, leads to race to bottom
- Useful as a sanity check, not as a primary pricing methodology
- For Morocco: limited direct comparables for most of your products → you define the category
3. Value-Based Pricing (recommended for SaaS)
Price based on the value delivered to the customer, not your cost.
- Most profitable approach for differentiated software
- Requires deep understanding of customer economics
- Formula:
Your Price ≤ Economic Value – Differentiation Premium
The value equation:
Customer's Next-Best Alternative (cost or value)
+
Differentiation Value (what you do better)
=
Economic Value to Customer (EVC)
Your Price should be EVC × (30–60%)
(leave enough value for the customer to justify switching)
The Pricing Ladder — From Free to Enterprise
Every product portfolio should have a clear pricing ladder that guides customers from entry to expansion:
FREE / FREEMIUM
↓ (conversion trigger: hit a limit, need a feature)
SELF-SERVE STARTER
↓ (conversion trigger: team growth, more data, advanced features)
PRO / GROWTH
↓ (conversion trigger: multi-user, compliance, integrations, support SLA)
ENTERPRISE / CUSTOM
↓ (expansion: more seats, more usage, adjacent modules)
Applied to SijilPharma:
FREE TRIAL (30 days, full features)
→ Starter: MAD 199/mo (1 user, basic inventory + prescriptions)
→ Pro: MAD 399/mo (3 users, + AI demand forecast + BI reports)
→ Enterprise: Custom (multi-branch, API access, dedicated support, SLA)
The anchor price: always show the highest plan first on your pricing page. The Enterprise price makes the Pro price feel reasonable. The Pro price makes Starter feel like a deal.
Value Metric — The Core of Usage-Based Pricing
The value metric is the unit by which customers pay. It should:
- Scale naturally with the value they receive
- Be easy to understand and measure
- Grow as the customer’s business grows
Choosing the right value metric:
| Product | Bad Value Metric | Good Value Metric |
|---|---|---|
| SijilPharma | Number of users (small pharmacies = 1–2 users) | Prescriptions processed/month OR monthly active patients |
| SijiLab | Number of users | Lab tests processed/month |
| NOTQIN IEIA | Number of users | Machines monitored |
| DigiTPME Diagnostic | Number of users | Diagnostics completed |
Why this matters: if your value metric scales with customer success, your revenue scales with their success. Customers who get more value pay more automatically — this is the engine of NRR > 100%.
Willingness to Pay (WTP) Research
Never guess WTP. Measure it.
Van Westendorp Price Sensitivity Meter (PSM)
Four survey questions:
- At what price would this product be so cheap you’d question its quality? (Too cheap)
- At what price would this product be a bargain? (Cheap / good value)
- At what price would this product be getting expensive but still acceptable? (Expensive)
- At what price would this product be too expensive to consider? (Too expensive)
Plot responses → find the Acceptable Price Range (between “too cheap” and “too expensive”) and the Optimal Price Point (where fewest people say too cheap OR too expensive).
Jobs-To-Be-Done Pricing Research
Interview existing or potential users:
- “What would happen to your business if you couldn’t use this product anymore?”
- “What’s the cost to your business of the problem this solves?”
- “What are you currently spending to solve this problem?”
- “What would you expect to pay for a solution like this?”
Willingness to Pay for Your Products (estimated from market context)
| Product | Segment | WTP Range | Rationale |
|---|---|---|---|
| SijilPharma | Independent pharmacy, Casablanca | MAD 150–500/mo | Saves ~3 hours/day of manual work × MAD 30/hr × 22 days = MAD 2,000 value → 25% of value |
| SijiLab | Medical lab, 10–50 tests/day | MAD 500–2,000/mo | Accreditation requirement + billing automation value |
| NOTQIN IEIA | Textile factory, 100+ looms | MAD 5,000–20,000/mo | 3–10% energy savings on MAD 500,000/mo bill = MAD 15–50k value |
| DigiTPME Diagnostic | SME owner, 10–50 employees | Free → MAD 2,000 one-time | Government program may subsidize → lower price sensitivity |
Packaging — What Goes in Each Tier
The good/better/best framework:
- Good (Starter): core value prop only. Must solve the primary job to be done.
- Better (Pro): core + productivity multipliers. Saves time, adds intelligence.
- Best (Enterprise): Pro + compliance, security, integrations, SLA, multi-user governance.
Feature placement principles:
- Never gatekeep features that make the product work (put in all tiers)
- Gatekeep features that drive expansion (team features, advanced analytics)
- Enterprise = compliance + security + support, NOT just “more features”
Common mistakes:
- ❌ Putting core features behind enterprise wall (drives churn, not expansion)
- ❌ Too many tiers (cognitive overload, analysis paralysis)
- ❌ Pricing tiers that don’t correspond to actual customer segments
- ❌ No clear upgrade trigger (customer never feels the need to upgrade)
Annual vs Monthly Pricing
Monthly: lower commitment, easier to start, lower churn friction, lower ACV. Annual: better cash flow for you, lower CAC (reduces involuntary churn), discount justification.
Standard: offer ~2 months free on annual plan (17% discount).
- Monthly: MAD 199/mo
- Annual: MAD 199 × 10 = MAD 1,990/year (pay monthly equivalent = MAD 166/mo)
Recommendation for your products:
- Self-serve SMB (SijilPharma, SijiLab small): offer both, push annual
- Enterprise (NOTQIN, SijiLab hospital): annual only, quarterly invoicing
Pricing Psychology
The Decoy Effect
When you add a “decoy” option, it makes the target option look more attractive.
Starter: MAD 199/mo ─── (looks affordable)
Pro: MAD 349/mo ─── (slightly better than starter for much more value)
Business: MAD 999/mo ─── (decoy: expensive, makes Pro look cheap)
Enterprise: Custom
Pro becomes the “obvious” choice. Business exists to anchor the relative value of Pro.
Anchoring
The first number seen sets the reference point for all subsequent evaluation.
- Show highest plan first → makes lower plans feel affordable
- Show annual pricing first (higher number) before monthly → monthly feels like a deal
Charm Pricing
MAD 199 feels significantly cheaper than MAD 200 (left-digit effect).
- Use 9s or 7s: MAD 199, MAD 399, MAD 1,990
The Paradox of Choice
Too many options → paralysis. 3 tiers = optimal for most SaaS. Never more than 5.
Loss Aversion (Kahneman)
Framing a price in terms of what the customer loses by not buying is more powerful than gain framing.
- “You’re losing MAD 3,000/month in inefficiencies” > “You’ll save MAD 3,000/month”
Enterprise Pricing — Different Game
Enterprise deals (> MAD 50,000/year) require a different approach:
- No public pricing: enterprise pricing is custom, negotiated
- ROI-based selling: your price is justified by quantified ROI (cost savings, revenue generated, risk avoided)
- Multi-year contracts: offer 15–20% discount for 2–3 year commitments
- Professional services add-on: implementation, training, customization billed separately
- Champion-based: find an internal champion who benefits from your product, help them build the business case for their procurement/IT committee
ROI Calculator for NOTQIN IEIA Enterprise:
Factory energy cost: MAD 500,000/month
Expected energy savings (5%): MAD 25,000/month
CBAM fine avoidance (estimated): MAD 15,000/year = MAD 1,250/month
Total monthly value: MAD 26,250/month
Annual value: MAD 315,000
NOTQIN IEIA price: MAD 15,000/month = MAD 180,000/year
ROI: (315,000 – 180,000) / 180,000 = 75% first-year ROI
Payback: 180,000 / 26,250 = 6.9 months
This is the document you put in front of the factory director. The price becomes a question of ROI, not cost.
Pricing for the Moroccan Market — Specific Considerations
Price sensitivity is high among Moroccan SMEs:
- Government programs (DigiTPME, ADEREE subsidies) can fund a portion → price sensitivity drops
- Emphasize MAD pricing (not EUR/USD) for local credibility
- Installment/quarterly payment options reduce psychological barrier
Reference benchmarks:
- ERP software (SAP Business One): MAD 50,000–200,000 implementation + MAD 5,000–15,000/mo
- Basic accounting software (SAGE): MAD 2,000–5,000/mo
- Generic CRM: MAD 500–2,000/mo
- Industrial energy management: No established local benchmark → you set the price
Price signaling:
- Too cheap in B2B = “low quality / not serious”
- For industrial clients: MAD 5,000+/month signals you’re enterprise-grade
- For SMEs: MAD 200–500/month is in the “I can justify this” range
When to Change Your Price
| Trigger | Action |
|---|---|
| Conversion rate > 30% on paid tier | You’re underpriced — test 20% increase |
| Churning customers citing “too expensive” > 5% of churn | Feature/value mismatch (rarely price itself) |
| Enterprise clients negotiating < 10% | Price is well-calibrated |
| Enterprise clients negotiating > 30% | You’re anchoring too high |
| NPS < 30 on paid tier | Fix product before raising price |
| New competitor at lower price | Don’t race to bottom — differentiate |
Price increase playbook:
- Grandfather existing customers (they keep old price) — builds loyalty
- New customers get new price immediately
- Offer 12-month lock-in at old price before increase — generates cash + goodwill
- Communicate the value you’ve added since last pricing
See Also
- SaaS Business Model & Metrics
- Product Management Frameworks
- Lean Startup & Business Model Canvas
- Platform Economics & Network Effects
- Go-To-Market
- Market Strategy
- DigiTPME Diagnostic Platform
- SijilPharma
- NOTQIN IEIA